Categories
trends

Question: Which state had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads in the 2000 presidential election?

Image results

Top 10 Results

1.Florida had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads

The Florida Recount Of 2000: A Nightmare That Goes On Haunting The weeks-long battle over “hanging chads” that ultimately landed the fate of the presidency in the U.S. Supreme Court, continues to …

2.Florida had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads

On December 12, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 5-to-4 vote, stopped the Florida recount. Though Gore received more popular votes than Bush, he conceded the next day. And the rest, as they say, is …

3.Florida had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads

The Florida election recount of 2000 was a period of vote recounting in Florida that occurred during the weeks after Election Day in the 2000 United States presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore.The Florida vote was ultimately settled in Bush’s favor by a margin of 537 votes when the U.S. Supreme Court, in Bush v. Gore, stopped a recount that had been initiated upon a ruling …

4.Florida had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads

By the end of Election Day, it was clear that contest would be decided by Florida’s 25 electoral votes. As the polls closed in Florida, television networks declared that Gore had won the state …

5.Florida had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads

Hanging chads and butterfly ballots. Broward County, Fla., officials manually count and recheck ballots on November 15, 2000. File Photo by Brian Wade/UPI. The initial results on election night had Bush defeating Gore by 1,784 votes, a margin small enough to trigger an automatic machine recount in Florida.

6.Florida had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. – Even if the presidential election hinges on a Florida recount like 20 years ago, hanging chads and butterfly ballots won’t be around to trip up voters and officials …

7.Florida had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads

Some of the discarded votes still had hanging chads. Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris was ordered by the Supreme Court to finish the counting of the votes by November 26. This led Al Gore and his team to file a case in the Supreme Court demanding a manual recount of the votes, since the machines couldn’t be trusted with the job.

8.Florida had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads

When election fraud is raised, this is the contest that most often raises its hand. John F. Kennedy won Illinois by 8,858 votes, but backers of Richard Nixon, then the sitting vice president, saw …

9.Florida had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads

In the 36 days that followed, Americans learned Gore had won the popular vote by 543,895 votes. But it’s winning the Electoral College that counts. As accusations of fraud and voter suppression …

10.Florida had to recount election votes due to hanging and dimpled chads

Ron Klain (Gore recount committee general counsel): I got a call on Election Day from a lawyer named Lester Hyman, probably at 8 a.m., Nashville time. His daughter, Liz, had called him to say that …

News results

1.Florida, butt of election jokes, believes system is ready

Even if the presidential election hinges on a Florida recount like 20 years ago, hanging chads and butterfly ballots won’t be around to trip up voters and officials — changes to ballots, equipment and laws have made the Bush-Gore circus a relic never to be revisited,

Published Date: 2020-10-26T00:00:00.0000000Z

2.Florida recount in 2000 echoes in 2020 as U.S. heads into Election Day

For most modern presidential elections in the United States, Americans have gone to bed on election night knowing who’s projected to win. But that was not the case on a couple of occasions.

Published Date: 2020-11-02T10:39:00.0000000Z

3.Florida, butt of election jokes, believes electoral system is ready

Even if the presidential election hinges on a Florida recount like 20 years ago, hanging chads and butterfly ballots won’t be

Published Date: 2020-10-31T17:27:00.0000000Z

BING based on video search results

1  Bush v. Gore: Understanding What Happened in the 2000 Presidential Election (2001)
Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), is the United States Supreme Court decision that resolved the dispute surrounding the 2000 presidential election. The ruling was issued on December 12, 2000. On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring. Eight days earlier, the Court unanimously decided the closely …
Watch Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DdEvjjJLeQ
2  USA: ELECTION: VOTE RECOUNT LATEST
English/Nat XFA The U.S. Supreme Court, divided 5-4, intervened once again Saturday in the deadlocked presidential race, granting George W. Bush’s plea to halt the Florida vote count on which Al Gore had pinned his best hopes of winning the White House. It was the latest and most dramatic split so far in a season of political division. The high …
Watch Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do39rrzLg_o

Wikipedia based search results

1.2000 United States presidential election

card voting booths, or errors having to do merely with the characteristics of punch card ballots (resulting in hanging, dimpled, or pregnant chads). A…

2.Bush v. Gore

changed to new voting machines to avoid punch cards, which had produced dimpled or hanging chads. A number of news media and scholarly articles have characterized…

Leave a Reply